"That's
not love, that's oxytocin" It's a colorful line of a husband catching his
wife in bed with another man in Sarah Ruhl's, Stage Kiss, theater play. While I
did not made it yet to New York to see this 2014 late success, I found this
paragraph in a fascinating book I read in the past months.
Few
months ago, when in London, Camelia was training herself into flowers and I was
wandering between bookshelves, sunny streets and my own ghosts. In the turmoil
of thoughts, shadows and restless search for answers, I got myself attracted on
the neuroscience library section, my late interest, by this title: "THE CHEMISTRY BETWEEN US. Love, sex and the science of attraction"
It
took me a few plane trips to finish it (lately I get to read only on planes)
but I devoured it and read second time the most of it. Half of it is too
technical and too much about lab rats experiments, animal studies and testing.
Even the former engineer in me got overwhelmed at some point about the data.
But the rest it's fabulous.
"Love is an addiction. Not in the
poetic, metaphorical way, but a real one. Love it is just chemicals stimulating
neural activity on well defined neural circuits, and not meany to elevate us in
some kind of a higher spiritual plane, but to lure us unthinkingly into reproduction,
thus maximizing our evolutionary fitness. It is all so base"
" ... the brain processes activated
during sexual bliss, and during the development of fetishes and partner preferences, have tremendous overlap with the brain circuit that makes drug
use fell so good. They both relies on the same structures, the same
neuro-chemicals and create the same changes in the brain ..."
Got
you interested? The room for debate is huge. With or without scientific
arguments everyone has his own views about love and its importance in our
lives. We do love. We need to love. We want to love. Or we just LOVE. Deeply,
madly, passionately love sometimes. How can this be trivialized and reduced just
to some neurons and the juice flowing between them?
Larry
Young and Brian Alexander explain that.
"We can know exactly how love, desire
and gender work in our brains, yet we'll still invent meaning to go alone with
that knowledge. We'll still celebrating the feelings and the thrills, as well
as lament the sadness.
Now we have a chance to be more wilful and
more conscious of what we are doing. We have the opportunity to end uniformed
prejudice, to appreciate the power of the love mechanism and to try to guard
against heedlessness. Like those who don’t believe in God, or in a life after
death, yet who construct ethical lives and find meaning despite the conviction
there is no supreme being waiting for them ..."
Me,
I chose love. I chose to believe that love exists. I chose to live and fight
for my love. For my wife, for my family, for my life. Yet, I know the guys are
right. I know that sometimes drugs and addiction might flow onto the same brain
circuits and inhibit any other flows wanting to pass in the same time. Reading this book helped me, once more, to understand that sometimes nature can
be defeated, but only by the awakened, informed and self controlled human
being.
Write
me if interested to read it, I will happily lend it to you. Or try Amazon.